Methodology of Thinking About the God Question
How do I begin serious thinking about the question of God's existence if I haven't studied philosophy before?
Many people think that reflecting on the question of God requires specialized academic study in philosophy. This is not correct. Serious thinking about this matter is available to every person who possesses reason and sincere curiosity. What matters is the method, not the certificates.
Inadequate responses to avoid
From some believers: "You don't need to think, just believe and that's enough" — an escape from intellectual responsibility. The Quran itself calls for reflection and contemplation dozens of times. "Read one religious book and you'll be convinced" — a harmful reduction. The matter is deeper than one book or one argument.
From some atheists: "Modern science has ended the debate, no need to think" — an empty claim. Leading scientists in physics and biology are divided on the matter. "Philosophy is a waste of time, empirical evidence alone suffices" — a misunderstanding of the nature of the question. The question of God is not a purely empirical question.
The right starting steps
First, define your current position honestly. Are you a believer wanting to deepen your faith? An atheist wanting to examine your position? Someone hesitant searching for an answer? There is no "wrong" starting point — what matters is honesty with oneself.
Second, understand the nature of the question. The question of God is not like "Is there life on Mars?" — it's not a purely empirical question. It combines:
- Philosophical questions (Why is there something rather than nothing?)
- Scientific questions (How do we explain the fine-tuning of the universe?)
- Existential questions (What is the meaning of life? Do morals have an objective foundation?)
- Personal empirical questions (religious experiences, fiṭra)
Third, familiarize yourself with the six pathways. Our methodology at god-database.org divides the evidence into six pathways:
1. Philosophical: purely rational arguments (causality, contingent and necessary)
2. Cosmic: evidence from the material universe (fine-tuning, beginning of the universe)
3. Human: from human nature (consciousness, morality, beauty)
4. Natural: the natural religious inclination in humans
5. Prophetic: the claims of prophets and their evidence
6. Textual: sacred scriptures
You don't need to study them all at once. Start with what sparks your curiosity most.
Fourth, read from both sides fairly. Don't only read what confirms your preconceived opinion. Read:
- From believers: such as William Lane Craig, Alvin Plantinga, Richard Swinburne
- From atheists: such as J. L. Mackie, Antony Flew (before his conversion), Graham Oppy
- From neutrals: such as Paul Draper
Fifth, learn basic critical thinking. Familiarize yourself with common logical fallacies:
- Straw man fallacy (distorting the opponent's position)
- Appeal to authority fallacy ("Scholar so-and-so said...")
- Hasty generalization fallacy
- Confusing correlation with causation
Sixth, be patient with yourself. This is a deep matter that the most brilliant minds throughout history have discussed. You won't solve it in a week or a month. Give yourself time for reading, reflection, and discussion.
Practical advice
- Start with introductory books, not complex philosophical works
- Discuss with different people but avoid sterile arguments
- Keep a notebook to record questions and ideas
- Be humble — admit when you don't understand something
- Avoid rushing — reaching a solid conviction takes time
Common mistakes to avoid
- Settling for YouTube videos or social media posts
- Reading only one side of the debate
- Confusing emotions with rational arguments
- Expecting absolute certainty (remember: we're talking about rational probability [rajḥān ʿaqlī])
- Despair of reaching any conclusion
Where we stand in this debate today
Serious thinking about the question of God has become easier than ever before thanks to the availability of sources. But it has also become more difficult due to the abundance of noise and misleading information. The key is methodology: starting with clear questions, balanced reading, critical thinking, and patience.
Remember: you don't need a PhD in philosophy. The greatest philosophers started with the same simple questions as yours. The difference is that they continued their research seriously and methodically.
For advanced reading
- Beginner level: "Does God Exist?" by William Lane Craig (translated)
- Intermediate level: The Cumulative Approach to Arguing for God's Existence
- "Getting Started" page in the Methodology section of the website
- "Open Mind" series for beginners on our site