Commentary on Ibn Sina's Isharat
al-Tusi, Nasir al-Din
Generated placeholder
Catalogue·Works·Islamic Classical·al-Tusi, Nasir al-Din

Commentary on Ibn Sina's Isharat

شرح إشارات ابن سينا

Commentaire sur les Isharat d'Ibn Sina

by al-Tusi, Nasir al-Dinc. 1235 CE / 632 AHEnglish
TheisticFalsafa (Islamic Philosophy)Islamic Classicalen original
i.

Editorial summary

Al-Tusi's Commentary on Ibn Sina's Isharat represents a pivotal moment in Islamic philosophical theology, offering a sophisticated defense and elaboration of Avicennian metaphysics against the critiques leveled by Fakhr al-Din al-Razi. Writing in the thirteenth century, al-Tusi undertakes a systematic rehabilitation of Ibn Sina's demonstration of God's existence and attributes, particularly focusing on the proof from contingency and necessity that forms the cornerstone of Islamic philosophical discourse about the divine.

The commentary engages directly with al-Razi's influential criticisms of Ibn Sina's Isharat, providing detailed responses that clarify and strengthen the original arguments. Al-Tusi demonstrates exceptional philosophical acumen in defending Ibn Sina's distinction between essence and existence, which proves crucial for establishing God as the Necessary Existent (wajib al-wujud). He argues that all beings whose essence does not include existence require an external cause, leading through a chain of causation that must terminate in a being whose very essence is existence itself. This being, identified as God, exists necessarily and serves as the ultimate ground for all contingent reality.

Al-Tusi's treatment of divine attributes shows particular sophistication, addressing the complex question of how multiple attributes can be predicated of an absolutely simple divine essence. He defends Ibn Sina's position that God's attributes are neither identical to nor separate from the divine essence, but rather represent different considerations of the same simple reality. This solution attempts to preserve both divine simplicity and the meaningfulness of theological language, responding to theologians who accused the philosophers of reducing God to an abstract principle devoid of the attributes affirmed in revelation.

The work's significance extends beyond mere commentary, as al-Tusi introduces original insights that advance the philosophical tradition. His analysis of mental existence and the modalities of being enriches Ibn Sina's framework, while his responses to theological objections demonstrate the compatibility of rigorous philosophical analysis with religious commitment. The commentary became instrumental in the subsequent development of Islamic philosophy, influencing later thinkers in both the eastern Islamic world and, through Latin translations of related works, medieval Christian scholasticism. Al-Tusi's text thus serves not merely as exegesis but as a creative philosophical work that shapes how subsequent generations approach questions of divine existence, causation, and the relationship between necessary and contingent being.

iv.

Argument formulations engaged

الإلهية الكلاسيكية
Discussed
اللاهوت العقلاني
Discussed
vi.

Related works

ExtendsCommentary on Ibn Sina's Isharat(al-Tusi, Nasir al-Din)Remarks and Admonitions(Ibn Sina)
Extends
Ibn Sina · 1034 CE
···
veritas in structura
Suggested citation

al-Tusi, Nasir al-Din (1235). Commentary on Ibn Sina's Isharat.

BibTeX
@book{commentary-on-ibn-sinas-isharat-1235,
  author    = {al-Tusi, Nasir al-Din},
  title     = {Commentary on Ibn Sina's Isharat},
  year      = {1235},
  url       = {https://god-database.com/en/works/commentary-on-ibn-sinas-isharat-1235}
}