The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice
Rae, Scott B.
Generated placeholder
Catalogue·Works·Modern Christian·Rae, Scott B.

The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice

أخلاقيات الإجهاض: مؤيد للحياة مقابل مؤيد للاختيار

L'Éthique de l'Avortement : Pro-Vie contre Pro-Choix

by Rae, Scott B.1989English
TheisticMoral PhilosophyModern Christianen original
i.

Editorial summary

This edited volume presents a comprehensive examination of the abortion debate through juxtaposing pro-life and pro-choice perspectives within a framework of Christian ethical analysis. Rae structures the collection to illuminate how theological commitments shape moral reasoning about personhood, human dignity, and the beginning of life. The work engages the abortion question not merely as a bioethical issue but as a fundamental theological problem concerning divine creation, human nature, and moral authority.

The volume's significance lies in its systematic exploration of how different conceptions of God and divine providence inform opposing positions on abortion. Pro-life contributors ground their arguments in doctrines of divine sovereignty and the imago Dei, contending that human life bears inherent sanctity from conception because it reflects God's creative act. These essays typically employ natural law reasoning alongside scriptural exegesis, arguing that abortion violates both divine command and the rational moral order established by God. The pro-life sections develop sophisticated philosophical defenses of fetal personhood while maintaining that secular arguments ultimately require theological foundations to establish absolute moral prohibitions.

Pro-choice contributors, while often sharing similar theological starting points, interpret divine compassion and human moral agency differently. These essays emphasize God's grant of free will and the complexity of moral decision-making in a fallen world. They argue that reducing abortion to simple prohibition fails to account for the full range of Christian ethical considerations, including justice, mercy, and pastoral care. Several contributions explore how different hermeneutical approaches to scripture yield varying conclusions about divine will regarding pregnancy termination.

Rae's editorial framework highlights how the abortion debate illuminates deeper theological divisions about biblical interpretation, the relationship between natural and revealed knowledge, and the proper exercise of human moral judgment under divine authority. The volume demonstrates that disagreements about abortion often reflect more fundamental differences in understanding God's nature and expectations for human behavior. By presenting these contrasting viewpoints within a single theological conversation, the work reveals how the abortion debate serves as a crucial test case for broader questions about divine command ethics, moral epistemology, and the interpretation of God's will in contemporary ethical dilemmas. The collection thus contributes to understanding how theological presuppositions shape bioethical reasoning and why the abortion debate remains intractable when participants operate from divergent conceptions of divine authority and human moral responsibility.

iv.

Argument formulations engaged

نظرية الأمر الإلهي
Discussed
···
veritas in structura
Suggested citation

Rae, Scott B. (1989). The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice.

BibTeX
@book{the-ethics-of-abortion-pro-life-vs-pro-c,
  author    = {Rae, Scott B.},
  title     = {The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice},
  year      = {1989},
  url       = {https://god-database.com/en/works/the-ethics-of-abortion-pro-life-vs-pro-choice-1989}
}